May 14, 2018 General Comments Off on Greenland Resources Updates on Malmbjerg
NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION TO UNITED STATES WIRE SERVICES OR DISSEMINATION IN THE UNITED STATES
TORONTO, May 14, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Greenland Resources Inc. (“Greenland Resources” or the “Company”) wishes to announce that it has engaged several engineering firms to investigate four alternatives to the Wardrop 2008 feasibility study (“2008 FS”), with the aim to improve project economics and reduce the construction timing. The most significant change to the 2008 FS is to construct the ore processing plant and ancillary plant site infrastructure facilities at an overseas shipyard on barges and locate the barges at suitable constructed sites at either the North or South access route tidewater locations.
The four alternative operating scenarios are described below and consider two well established mining methods (open pit and underground block cave) with two different access routes to transport ore from the deposit to the tidewater ore processing facility. The two access routes under consideration are the North access route with a distance of 25 km and South access route of 85 km.
Conventional open pit mining operation with an underground crushing and grinding chamber to pulverize the ore for hydraulic transport to the south tidewater processing plant. Surface maintenance / warehouse and administration structures will be constructed near the mining operation to complete mobile equipment maintenance and manage operations. This scenario requires the construction of an all-weather gravel airstrip suitable for Boeing 737-800 freight / passenger combo (“Combo”) aircraft and establishment of an appropriate tailings disposal site.
Open pit mining operation as presented in Option #1, with an ore transport pipeline to the tidewater processing plant 25 km to the North through an 11 km tunnel. Similar surface structures required for Option #1 will be applicable for Option #2. This scenario is attractive as there is already an operating government-maintained airstrip suitable for Boeing 737-800 Combo aircraft and an appropriate natural tailings disposal site.
Block cave mining operation with an underground crushing and grinding chamber to pulverize the ore for hydraulic transport to the south tidewater processing plant, plant site and infrastructure along the same routing as Option #1 less surface environmental disturbance will be generated by the underground mining option as compared to the open pit option. Similar to what was mentioned in Option #1, an all-weather gravel airstrip suitable for Boeing 737-800 Combo aircraft and establishment of an appropriate tailings disposal site will be required.
Block cave mining operation as mentioned in Option #3 with all the necessary hydraulic ore transportation infrastructure to pump ore to the north tidewater processing plant. Less surface environmental disturbance will be generated by the underground mining option as compared to the open pit option. This scenario is attractive as there is already an operating government-maintained airstrip suitable Boeing 737-800 Combo aircraft and an appropriate tailings disposal site.
Technical Advisory Team
The team advising management includes:
Keith C. Minty, P. Eng. MBA
Keith is assisting in the development and management of the team of consultants in the formulation of the project operating scenarios. He has over 30 years of successfully developing, constructing, commission and both operating open pit and underground mines worldwide and in arctic operating conditions. Among others, he was President & CEO of the TSX listed company North American Palladium since conception to >$1b market cap and was awarded in 2000 the Mining Man of the year by The Northern Miner.
R. Hammett, P.Eng., Principal (Block cave geomechanics and mine design)
D. Sprott, P. Eng., Principal, Senior Mining Engineer (Block cave mine design, scheduling and cost estimation)
Golder Associates Ltd. have performed the conceptual block caving assessment and determined that a block caving scenario has operational and economic potential and warrants further study.
Hardrock Hickey & Associates LLC/ Dean Brox Consulting Ltd.
Hardrock Hickey & Associates LLC
C. Hickey, P. Eng., Principal (Tunnel engineering specialist)
Dean Brox Consulting Ltd.
D. Brox, P. Eng., Principal (Tunnel engineering specialist)
Hardrock Hickey & Associates/ Dean Brox Consulting completed the conceptual analysis of developing the 11 km tunnel from the North tidewater location to the deposit and determined that the tunnel is technically feasible and suitable for man transportation; project services include ore transport and consumables.
DRA Group Holdings (Modular processing plant and plant site design)
V. Jayaraman, M.Eng., MBA, Vice President, Origination
Val Coetzee, M.Eng, Manager – Process Engineering Group, South Africa
Vlad Feldman, P.Eng, Vice President, Projects – Americas
The DRA Global Group responsibilities are to conceptually complete the preliminary study work of constructing the ore concentrator, concentrator loadout, plant site, powerplant structure, administration and accommodation modules and infrastructure on barges at an overseas shipyard as well as transport to site for a Turnkey start-up.
Patterson & Cooke
R. Cooke, P.Eng., Principal (Ore Transport specialist)
Patterson & Cooke are considered to be one of the most experienced hydraulic ore transportation systems groups worldwide and they are performing the conceptual engineering and design work of transporting ore from the deposit to the concentrator and tailings from the concentrator to the tailings management facility.
Moose Mountain Technical Services
J. Gray, P. Eng., President and Principal (Mine design & scheduling, capital and operating cost analysis)
The Moose Mountain Technical Services group will adapt the open pit design from their work on the 2008FS and compare this to the conceptual underground block caving mine designs and schedules from Golders. Moose Mountain will also assemble the life of mine capital and operating costs provided by the other team members for the scenarios for use in cash flow models.
About Greenland Resources Inc.
Greenland Resources is a Canadian reporting issuer regulated by the Ontario Securities Commission, focused on the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Greenland. The flagship project is the Malmbjerg Molybdenum deposit, a world class Climax-type molybdenum deposit located in east-central Greenland. With offices in Toronto, the Company is led by a management team with an extensive track record in the mining industry and capital markets. For further details, please refer to our web site (www.greenlandresources.ca) as well as our Canadian regulatory filings on Greenland Resources’ profile at www.sedar.com.
Mr. Jim Steel, P.Geo., M.B.A., a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101 has reviewed and approved the technical information in this press release.
|For further information please contact:|
|Ruben Shiffman||Executive Chairman|
|Jesper Kofoed||President & CEO|
|Gary Anstey||Investor Relations / Business Development|
|Corporate office||Suite 612, 390 Bay St. Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5H 2A4|
|Telephone||+1 647 273 9913|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT: No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein. This news release contains forward-looking information which is not comprised of historical facts. Forward-looking information involves risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events, results, performance, prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information. Forward looking information in this news release includes, but is not limited to, the Company’s objectives, goals or future plans, statements regarding the estimation of mineral resources, exploration results, potential mineralization, exploration and mine development plans, the availability of financing, the timing of the commencement of operations and estimates of market conditions. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from such forward-looking information include, but are not limited to, failure to convert estimated mineral resources to reserves, capital and operating costs varying significantly from estimates including the costs of operations in remote mountainous environments, delays in obtaining or failures to obtain required governmental, environmental or other project approvals, political risks, uncertainties relating to the availability and costs of financing needed in the future, changes in equity markets, inflation, changes in exchange rates, fluctuations in commodity prices, delays in the development of projects and the other risks involved in the mineral exploration and development industry. Although the Company believes that the assumptions and factors used in preparing the forward-looking information in this news release are reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on such information, which only applies as of the date of this news release, and no assurance can be given that such events will occur in the disclosed time frames or at all. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking information, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, other than as required by law.
Comments Off on Former Tainan County council speaker nabbed in Philippines
Comments Off on NARLabs launches National Laboratory Animal Center
Comments Off on Analysts: Seoul-Tokyo Diplomatic Rows Unlikely to Have Lasting Effect
Comments Off on No reason’ Iran sanctions will lead to higher oil prices: US’ Hook
Comments Off on Checkpoint Therapeutics Initiates Registrational Development Programs for Anti-PD-L1 Antibody CK-301
Comments Off on Roughly 4,000 full-time employees on furlough in solar industry