Padipat” reveals that he directly saw “Wan Nor” set up a third committee to ask for opinions after there were still objections to accepting the work to build the parliament building. Point out that there are still differences between political opinions. architectural engineering facts
Mr. Padipat Santipada, First Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, spoke about the progress of the inspection of the Parliament building. that what he and Mr. Wan Muhammad Noor Matha, President of the National Assembly and Speaker of the House of Representatives The consensus is that a third committee should be set up because there are still objections to not inspecting the Parliament building on 6 issues, which also have mixed opinions between political opinions and engineering and architectural facts. But how can you separate the two? If you’re looking for perfection, you don’t have it. One nut isn’t perfect. But if it’s a big deal that doesn’t match the model and breaks the contract This requires engineering opini
on.
‘We will set up this committee. To give opinions to the Secretary-General of the Council which was graciously received finished and have full power If this committee only studies engineering opinions, What do you think is acceptable after inspection? Something that cannot be verified If the contract has not been amended or there is a request for amendment. We will make a complete report in a short time. for the Secretary-General of the Council and the president of the council Has made a decision based on facts. The 3-party committee will consist of 1. Representative of the Secretariat of the Council who are not members of the inspection committee 2. Council of Engineers, academics who have no interest in the contract and political parties That must include representatives from both the opposition and the government. Come join in too. In order for this committee to maintain its status in giving the most honest and diverse opinions,’ Mr. Padipat said.-312.-Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency