Parade screams “Pita” wants to become prime minister quickly, while “Pita” is confident in the objection of the party submitted to the Election Commission and noted the attitude of hastening the decision. Submitted to the Constitutional Court in continuation from yesterday
Reporters reported that Mr. Phitha Limcharoenrat List MPs and Prime Minister candidates with members of the Progressive Party Traveled to meet the executives of the Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (Public Organization) or GISTDA. When Mr. Phitha arrived, there were fan clubs, employees, civil servants and people both Thai and foreign. at work and come to contact the agencies within Building B Chaengwattana Government Center wait for encouragement cheer along with stating that the real one is very handsome, the prime minister is very handsome, wants to be prime minister quickly and wants to take a picture with Mr. Pita
While some people know that Mr. Phitha has arrived hurriedly came out and walked to take Mr. Pita to the elevator on the way up to the GISTDA office. Mr. Pita waved hello. Ready to walk through the office of the Election Commission of Thailand. The Election Commission is holding a meeting to consider submitting the matter to the Constitutional Court to determine qualifications. But Mr. Phitha refused to answer, only stating that today he was invited by GISTDA to talk, but when the media asked Mr. Rueangkrai to request an autograph, Mr. Phitha said what did he do? i don’t know Normally, the signature is not to be overused. Normally, the people’s brothers and sisters. It will not be the same as signed as documentary evidence. Therefore, it would be useless to take it to check. Guess when the reporter explained that Mr. Rueangkrai wanted him to sign a book on a long way to go. Mr. Pita said, “Oh no, today I intend to come to a meeting with GISTDA, who should have contacted me after the election since I haven’t had the opportunity to come yet. It’s about the drought that happened. They will talk about whether they can use technology to solve drought problems or not.
When asked, Mr. Ruangkrai said that the documents submitted by the party objected. The Election Commission is a violation of the law. Mr. Pita said that he thought that our legal department had checked well. by stakeholders However, the legal department has prepared adequately. Definitely not in a hurry. Which has been speculated in many stories, as interviewed by many media outlets that it is similar to the V Luck Media case of Mr. Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit Therefore, our legal department is prepared and prepared. If there is a case of accelerating the wrong process near the prime ministerial election day It’s something that we already predicted.
However, when Mr. Phitha went up to the meeting room of GISTDA’s office, GISTDA officials broke away from their desks and cheered and greeted Mr. Phitha enthusiastically. The GISTDA office informed that the discussion between the executives of the office and Mr. Phitha would take about an hour and there would be a press conference.
The reporter reported that While Mr. Phitha was arriving, Mr. Ruangkrai Leekitwattana, a member of the Palang Pracharat Party Came to submit a letter to the Election Commission of Thailand opposing Mr. Pita’s letter sent to the Election Commission on July 10, arguing against the process of filing a case to the Constitutional Court ruling Mr. Pita’s status. that it is unlawful, stating that the letter that Mr. Phitha sent to the Election Commission of Thailand claimed that the legal provisions were incorrect and saw that the operation of The Election Commission of Thailand is legitimate, with the Election Commission conducting an investigation in the same way that it conducted with Thanathorn. Juangroongruangkit In the case of holding V Luck shares and the Constitutional Court has ruled in such cases as a norm that the proceedings The Election Commission is legitimate.
In addition, Mr. Ruangkrai also saw that before the Election Commission sent the Constitutional Court to rule on Mr. Phitha’s case There is no need to invite Mr. Phitha to clarify first. because it was a case of submission under section 82 of the constitution, not proceedings under section 151 of the Election Act, where he was of the view that if this was the case, it was necessary to invite the accused to clarify first and submission to the Constitutional Court to determine the qualifications of MPs according to Section 82, the first paragraph of the Constitution, which grants the right MPs submit names through the Speaker of the House of Representatives The accused was not given clarification first, which the Kao Klai Party MPs used to use this step when submitting their case through the Speaker of the House. Let the Constitutional Court decide on the status of the Minister of Transport. And the Election Commission’s consideration was not in a hurry because it had filed this matter since May 10, and if compared to the Thai Rak Patriot dissolution case, it took only 2 weeks.
Mr. Ruangkrai also said that that this time came to submit the letter in person Different from the past, it will be submitted by post. It’s not because he knows that Mr. Phitha will travel to the Government Center building, but he knows that the Election Commission will have a meeting to consider this matter today. Therefore, he was afraid that if the letter was sent by post, it would not arrive at the Office of the Election Commission of Thailand in time, so he had to come and submit it himself.
“When Mr. Phitha traveled, he wanted to meet. would like to ask for a signature to sign the book on the way of life that he bought and have read which Mr. Phitha wrote well as Mr. Thanathorn and Mr. Piyabutr Khian, ”said Mr. Ruangkrai as he showed the reporter the book on the long way of life that he bought.
While reporters reported that The Election Commission started its meeting at 10:00 a.m. as the next meeting. because yesterday in the case of Mr. Phitha Holding shares of ITV Public Company Limited is subject to prohibition from exercising the right to run for election. Member of the House of Representatives according to Section 98 (3) of the constitution and causing membership MPs terminated according to section 101 (6) of the constitution to submit to the Constitutional Court a decision according to section 82 of the constitution, which yesterday at the first meeting The Election Commission has not yet decided whether to refer the matter to the Constitutional Court. It’s just a follow-up of the fact-finding committee’s progress reported to the meeting for acknowledgment. Therefore, the Election Commission has scheduled a meeting today. But there is still no confirmation that there will be a vote or not because the Election Commission has scheduled a meeting in advance today and July 13, it may be possible that The Election Commission will take the time to consider, along with Mr. Itthiporn Boonprakong, President of the Election Commission. Stated that consideration of the matter was based on the completeness of the complaint being fact-checked. Content and Legal by consideration of The ECT did not specify when the process would be rushed to complete it.
In the consideration of The Election Commission under Section 82 of the Constitution is a guideline for submitting consideration to the Constitutional Court for decision. As for the consideration under Section 151 that the Election Commission previously set up an inquiry committee It is a matter of criminal prosecution. But both cases are about the holding of media shares that must prove information and evidence that Mr. Phitha Do you actually hold shares? And is that stock a newspaper or mass media business or not? – Thai News Agency
Source: Thai News Agency