Parliament, “Chaiwat” ready to fight the case after ALRO Korat filed a complaint. Emphasize that people get ALRO. There must be no place to eat. Pointing is equal to admitting that it is your own pin. If you say you don’t want to pin it anywhere, then pin it. The bureaucracy can’t do it.
Mr. Chaiwat Limlikhitaksorn Director of the National Park Office Referring to the case of being reported by the Korat ALRO to take action against the withdrawal of 27 pins, he said that this was normal. which is an advantage Because he confirmed that this is the principle of ALRO. We don’t have to prove it. Because normally you must apply the principles of the ALRO. Go to the evidence department to check where this principle came from, which lot was purchased, who did the procurement. Who is the recipient? But when the Korat ALRO said that it was his principle, they came to report that they had only stolen state property.
‘I am not worried, I will be sure that it is really his principle from listening to the explanation of
The ALRO makes it uncertain whether the principles of the ALRO can be applied or not. Put it in a carrying bag and want to pin it anywhere? Because normally, going out to survey or setting up a site requires a plan, a financial plan, and hiring labor. Must use a car to transport the stakes to the community. There must be a surveyor to do the embroidery as well. Here, clarity must be given to society. But I listened and it sounded like I was walking with my hand in my hand. If you want to plant it next to the creek or river, plant it. It’s funny. Which cannot be done in the bureaucratic system,’ Mr. Chaiwat said.
As for the clarification in the committee meeting room It looks like the National Park Service. with the Royal Thai Survey Department Still arguing about the map lines, Mr. Chaiwat said that the Military Survey Department was trying to show the traces. Therefore, we can see a look back to the year 1953. We explained that the traces that we saw in a grid pattern were forest gardens, not villagers who
went in to farm or the arrangement of the original villagers’ land. which is now cleared in the same way At the same time, the Military Survey Department admitted that they did not seize the pins. But it is based on field books or recordings in survey books. Including the area next to it that has a creek. and asked the villagers what kind of peak this is, but the creek is 10-20 km long, it’s not like they want to take it here. But it doesn’t matter because the decision has already been reached in the committee. and informed the Office of the National Land Policy Commission (NCTC) that from now on various agencies, whether it be the National Park Service, ALRO, Royal Thai Survey Department Department of Land Development The administration sent them down to survey together. By bringing the tools of each department with you. Then go place it in the system. We believe that we can accept each other. Therefore, the map that will move forward does not need to talk about the military map. If you can accept it, you do
n’t have to go to the administrative court. or continue to sue the court
When asked about the lines that were drawn after going to the area with a knife. Whatever it is Can you accept it? Mr. Chaiwat said yes, because he went himself to the Royal Thai Survey Department. Various agencies go themselves so there will be witnesses to confirm that the way they walked is correct. Because it’s working together. no conflict If everyone wishes well for the country We can definitely go together.
The Prime Minister stated that the lines of the military map should be adhered to. Will it make the lines of the Royal Thai Survey Department have a higher status than the lines of other agencies’ maps or not? Mr. Chaiwat said that the Prime Minister has not yet certified that the lines of the military map are used in this case. But today, the ALRO took this line to sue that it was in the ALRO area, so they came to report the matter. In principle, we have to talk. But he was not angry as expected. This map line must be agreed
upon next time as to which way to start in order to be the cheapest.
As for the case of the committee Invite ALRO to explain But not once did he come. Mr. Chaiwat said that today he was sad because the two times he came to explain to the ALRO committee, no representative came to answer. For example, today is claimed to be the founding day of the ALRO. which must be responsible Because today there is a meeting Must clarify and bring information to the Commissioner for acknowledgment and answer objections. But today I heard a representative from the Council of State clearly state that Such areas must be classified with a plan and financial plan in order to create a plot.
As for the names of those who have been allocated ALRO even though they are not in the area, does the National Park Service have the right to use the power to revoke it? Mr. Chaiwat said that the Commissioner There has already been a list of names that say more than 10 people out of 58 people are not in the area. but has been allocated No mat
ter which group of civil servants should have the right to receive allocations. If there is really no land to farm, it is not a capital group that has land to farm, has securities, has various things that should not be obtained, they must be separated. Moreover, when they criticize the ALRO, they say that people are doing wrong and are dishonest. Not saying it’s a generalization.
Source: Thai News Agency