Office of the Administrative Court, The Administrative Court points out the Chula-Uthen Thawai dispute. End with a clear government policy that both parties agree on.
Mr. Prawit Bunthiam, Chairman of the Tort Litigation and Other Liability Division at the highest administrative level Help work temporarily in the position of Vice President of the Supreme Administrative Court. Referring to the case of the dispute between Chulalongkorn University and Rajamangala University of Technology Tawan-Ok or Uthenthawai, the Administrative Court did not issue a judgment by force. Government agencies sue in court But the matter must be forwarded to the Attorney General’s Office. To be brought into the Civil Case Arbitration Committee which has representatives of many government agencies When the diagnosis results are available, they will be presented to the Cabinet and have the government agencies follow suit. If they do not comply, they must present it to the Cabinet.
Therefore, in the case of a dispute between Chula I
t therefore enters the consideration of this committee. And there was a notification of the decision in 2010 that allowed Uthen Thawai to move. and return the area to Chulalongkorn University Ready to pay damages of 1,140,900 baht from 2006 until the area is returned. But due to various problems Still, the resolution of the said committee has not been complied with. Until Uthen Thawai found that this committee’s decision was incorrect. Therefore, he filed a lawsuit with the Administrative Court in 2013, with Uthen Thawai being the one who sued the arbitration committee. along with Chulalongkorn University They wanted the court to revoke the decision of this committee. However, when the Administrative Court considered it, it dismissed the case because it found that the decision was correct based on the claims. Controversies such as those that claim His Majesty King Mongkut Klao Chao Yuhua had it granted to Uthen in 1923, but the court found that There is no evidence of this, but it only appears that It was a g
rant of 10,000 baht to build a factory for engineering students. didn’t see that It is a royal offering. As for the other reasons, it is seen that there was a transfer of assets to Chulalongkorn in 1939 and the third reason which can be heard is that The parties agreed in 2004 that Uthen Thawai would move out of the area within 2005. If necessary, the time could be extended. and pay compensation of 1,140,900 baht per year
Therefore, in this matter, the Administrative Court dismissed the case. Because after considering that The decision of the arbitration committee was accepted. As a result of this matter, the court did not issue regulations. It simply confirmed the decision of the arbitration committee and the court agreed. As for Chula, they cannot request the court to enforce it. Because according to the law, the court can’t do it. But that doesn’t mean it can’t be changed. Everything must move forward like this. Because everything depends on government policy. and the agreement of both Chulalongkorn and U
then Thawai, so the question of Ask the court to enforce the order or not, you must answer no and cannot order.
Source: Thai News Agency