Constitutional Court, The Constitutional Court does not accept the petition of “Ruangkrai” calling on “Pheu Thai” to issue a statement amending Section 112 without evidence of exercising rights and freedoms to subvert the government.
The Constitutional Court unanimously decided not to accept the request to consider the case in which Mr. Rueangkrai Leekitwattana asked the Constitutional Court to consider the decision according to Section 49 of the Constitution that the actions of the Pheu Thai Party According to the statement of Mr. Chaikasem Nitisiri on October 31, 2021 regarding the amendment of the Criminal Code, Section 112, which has the Pheu Thai Party logo included. It has the nature of supporting actions that may lead to the repeal of Section 112 of the Criminal Code in a manner that is not a legitimate legislative process. and Mr. Rueang Krai Yang Further examination of the evidence found that the Pheu Thai Party still maintains Mr. Chaikasem’s statement. on the respondent’s social media until now I
t is the use of rights or freedoms to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State according to the Constitution, Section 49, paragraph one.
In this regard, the Court is of the opinion that the facts in the petition and the supporting documents It appears that Mr. Chaikasem, who is not the party leader and does not have authority to act on behalf of the Pheu Thai Party. Moreover, there have not yet been facts and evidence showing that Does the Pheu Thai Party have any intentions or actions that are likely to produce results? It is the use of rights or freedoms to overthrow the democratic regime of government with the King as Head of State according to the Constitution, Section 49, paragraph one.
Source: Thai News Agency